Welcome to Sex and the State, a newsletter about human connection. To support my life’s work, upgrade to a paid subscription, buy one of my guides, follow me on OnlyFans, follow me on Twitter, support me on Patreon, or just share this post 🙏 ~~~~~Sex and the State is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The obvious reason that women (and men) should care about men in distress is self interest. The more men who are doing well, educated, employed, taking care of themselves the better society, the economy and human relations will be. Women will have access to a larger pool of equal partners if they want them.
On the other hand, the more men slide into bad health, unemployment, and despair the more young men in particular will be drawn into right wing extremism.
Life after all is not or shouldn’t be a zero sum game.
I have a question - are you suggesting women stop talking care of themselves in favor of tending to men’s needs so they don’t destroy democracy in their need to be in control? Or something different? (I suspect the latter...but am curious)
The obvious reason that women (and men) should care about men in distress is self interest. The more men who are doing well, educated, employed, taking care of themselves the better society, the economy and human relations will be. Women will have access to a larger pool of equal partners if they want them.
On the other hand, the more men slide into bad health, unemployment, and despair the more young men in particular will be drawn into right wing extremism.
Life after all is not or shouldn’t be a zero sum game.
I have a question - are you suggesting women stop talking care of themselves in favor of tending to men’s needs so they don’t destroy democracy in their need to be in control? Or something different? (I suspect the latter...but am curious)