Sex and the State

Sex and the State

Share this post

Sex and the State
Sex and the State
Stop promoting women (who aren't me) part 1

Stop promoting women (who aren't me) part 1

Cathy Reisenwitz's avatar
Cathy Reisenwitz
Jul 08, 2024
∙ Paid
10

Share this post

Sex and the State
Sex and the State
Stop promoting women (who aren't me) part 1
2
1
Share

“We need to get more women into leadership.”

As a woman increasingly stepping into leadership and embracing power, I wholeheartedly endorse affirmative action for me, specifically.

I’ll take all the help I can get. But I can’t wholeheartedly embrace the idea that there’s something inherent to all or most women that makes us necessarily better leaders than men. It seems like a reverse sexism to me. A misandry, even.

I honestly do not care what my leaders are packing in terms of genitals or chromosomes. I care deeply about my leaders’ character, compassion, and competence. I think it’s deeply stupid to consider gender 99.9% of the time.

However, despite my best efforts, gender, and thus sexism, continue to exist. Research indicates that maybe decision-makers should consider gender. Organizations with a greater percentage of women in power tend to outperform organizations with more male-heavy leadership.

Here’s what I sought to understand: To what extent can an organization improve performance merely by replacing a few men at the top with women?

Here’s what I found.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Sex and the State to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Cathy Reisenwitz 🏗🌐🥑
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share