Sex and the State

Sex and the State

Share this post

Sex and the State
Sex and the State
The New York Times is lowkey anti-gender

The New York Times is lowkey anti-gender

Cathy Reisenwitz's avatar
Cathy Reisenwitz
Nov 11, 2024
∙ Paid
23

Share this post

Sex and the State
Sex and the State
The New York Times is lowkey anti-gender
13
3
Share

In an October 2024 essay, Ruth Whippman took aim at “positive masculinity.” Traits we tend to associate with traditional masculinity are fine, according to Whippman. Who doesn’t want to be strong, brave, heroic, physically tough, etc., at least on occasion?

The problem with positive masculinity is that it can’t solve the underlying problem that Whippman kept seeing in her interviews with boys for her book. Men and boys are under constant, severe pressure to consistently, flawlessly perform their gender. To solve that problem, we’re going to need to abolish masculinity.

Fox News, perhaps not shockingly, did not enjoy Ruth’s op-ed. It’s the kind of thing right-wing and Republican bloviators love to point to when claiming the left-wing and Democratic Party are waging a war on boys, men, and masculinity. 

I, on the other hand, enjoyed the essay. There’s only one, small thing I’d change.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Sex and the State to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Cathy Reisenwitz 🏗🌐🥑
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share